The History of One Day Cricket: Part I
by Devanshu Mehta
The One Day International has changed dramatically in its 40 years of existence. Here is part one of my analysis of the game:
Highest Score per team, per year
We’ve come a long way since the ’70s. It used to be a 60-over innings and teams barely got a couple of hundred runs. In 1977, no team made more than 250 in their allotted 60 overs. Every year since 2004, the top eight teams have had a 300+ score every year. We’ve come a long way, baby.
Take a look at how Jayasuriya and company changed the game in 1996. It’s an outlier, so different from the years around it and wouldn’t be surpassed until the batting powerplay was instituted in 2006.
Highest Score of World Cup 2011: 375 by India against Bangladesh
Runs per over per team, per year
We’ve gone from a par average of 4 to a par average of 5.5. In 1994, every team had a yearly run rate of 5 and under. By 2010, every team was over 5. In fact, South Africa finished 2010 at 6 runs per over for the year.
Top 8 Teams Run Rate at World Cup 2011: 5.38
Runs per wicket per team, per year
Now here’s something that hasn’t changed much as the game has changed. Even though teams are scoring at a (much) faster pace, the runs per wicket has been largely steady. Barring some outliers (West Indies in the early days, Australia in the last 10 years), the average has barely increased from the upper 20’s to the low 30’s.
In both this chart and the runs per over, Sri Lanka’s progress between say 1983 and 1996 has been the most dramatic. On this chart, Sri Lanka goes from about 18 in 1984 to 38 in 1997. Of note: Australia crossed 50 runs per wicket in 2001.
Also, look how the mighty have fallen. West Indies dominates every chart here for the first decade and then drops off the map. Finally, the era of Aussie dominance ended in 2008- the orange dot on all three charts falls from the top that year.
World Cup 2011: Matches Among Top 8 Teams:
Side Batting First: 29.58 Runs per Wicket
Side Batting Second: 31.61 Runs per Wicket
Overall: 30.49
In the next installment, I will present three charts on how the balance of power in one day internationals has changed over 40 years.
Notes:
- Only the top eight teams (no Zimbabwe, no Bangladesh) have been considered.
- The runs per over are for the entire year, with each dot representing a different team.
- The runs per wicket are for the entire year, with each dot representing a different team.
- The highest score is the highest score for a particular team in that year.
- The color code for each country is consistent across all charts.
- Statistics until the end of 2010 are reflected in the charts.
This is great. Can you explain something to me though — why does the average run per wicket stay largely the same? I would have thought if teams were scoring more runs over the decade, the average runs per wicket would go up? What am I missing?
What it means that more and more teams have deeper batting lineups, and inspite of the runs per wicket remaining the same, batsmen lower down the order are also scoring runs.
This also means that more wickets are falling in 50 overs than they were earlier.
This is purely intuition, but I think until the early ’90s, you could get away with ending 50 overs at 240/4. These days that would be a travesty, those six remaining wickets would be leaving money on the table.
[…] The History of One Day Cricket: Part I I am glad that many of the most popular posts are also ones I enjoyed writing the most. […]
[…] The History of One Day Cricket in Numbers (deepbackwardpoint.com) […]